gogga posts stuff

Ha ha!

NewsNet5.com publishes a short article titled “How Sanitizer Tests Are Conducted“. I love the outcome of the finding, just love it:

• Lucky Hand Sanitizer — showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Sani-Doo Hand Sanitizer — showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.
• April Bath & Shower Hand Sanitizer –- showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.
• American Red Cross -– showed significant reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Purell — showed significant reduction of bacteria count after use.
• “Pure” Generic Hand Sanitizer — showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Family Dollar Generic Hand Sanitizer -– showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Target Generic Hand Sanitizer — showed significant reduction of bacteria count after use.
• CVS Generic Hand Sanitizer — showed significant reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Walgreens Generic Hand Sanitizer — showed significant reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Rite Aid Generic Hand Sanitizer — showed some reduction of bacteria count after use.
• Personal Care Hand Sanitizer — showed little to no reduction of bacteria count after use.

LOL! So, there’s only a few that actually work, huh? Wow… who allows these products on the market??? I thought FDA is supposed to be keeping a watchful eye on this kind of stuff, no? Anybody?? We’re not talking about Acinetobacter here!! Just about dirty hands… well, hands washed with cleaning products…

Hmm… strange… Oh well…

Interesting. I would like to know the response of those vendors whose products failed. Actually, this article gives me a good idea for setting up my own test of my own technology. Head-on comparison with alcohol, cleaning products, soap, etc.